Swain, an employee who suffered injuries from a workplace accident, filed legal actions against AIG, Thomas, Coventry, and Angeles, parties involved in handling his workers' compensation claim. Swain accused them of intentional infliction of emotional distress, fraud, and conspiracy, alleging that they prioritized their financial interests over his urgent medical needs.
As a result of their alleged negligence, Swain suffered a severe mental breakdown. However, the trial court dismissed Swain's claims, arguing they fell under the Alabama Workers' Compensation Act. Swain appealed this decision. The appellate court, referencing the Lowman case, suggested that Swain's tort claims might not be restricted by the Act and highlighted that Swain's emotional and mental distress claims are distinct from his workplace injury. The court emphasized that Swain should be given the opportunity to prove his case before any dismissal based on lack of evidence. The appellate court concluded that the trial court's decision was premature and remanded the case for further proceedings.
"Special Employee" Status Shields Midsouth from Negligence Claims: Court Validates Exclusive-Remedy Provisions
Tenax Granted Immunity in Worker's Injury Lawsuit due to Alabama Workers' Compensation Act
Court Reverses Denial of Summary Judgment, Finds Uninstalled Safety Saw Does Not Equate to Removal of a Safety Guard
Rock Wool Asserts Worker's Injury Claims Barred by Workers' Compensation Act, Countering Casons' Suit under Employer's Liability Ac
Court Rules on Dismissal and Jury Trial Issues in Workplace Assault Case
TDY Employee's Injury Lawsuit Faces Jurisdiction Challenge on Appeal After Key Counts Dismissed by Trial Court.
A Prolonged Battle Over Workers' Compensation and Negligence Claims
Plaintiff Appealed a Summary Judgment in Favor of APCo on Claims of Negligence and Wantonness
Tort Claims Against Special Employer are Barred by Exclusive-Remedy Provision of the Act
Procedural Dispute of Proper Court to review Exclusivity Provisions
Release of Claims Under Workers' Compensation Act does not include Claims Based on Willful Removal of Safety Devicee
Tenax Granted Immunity in Worker's Injury Lawsuit due to Alabama Workers' Compensation Act