Martin, an ex-employee of Lincare, resigned due to the hostile environment created by her supervisor, Stewart. Subsequent to her resignation, Stewart physically assaulted Martin on Lincare's property. Instead of addressing this assault, Lincare issued a trespass order against Martin. Martin, in response, sued both Lincare and Stewart. Her claims included seeking workers' compensation from Lincare and accusing both parties of assault, battery, and outrage.
Lincare and Stewart sought the dismissal of Martin's claims, citing, among other arguments, the exclusivity provision of the Workers' Compensation Act. The initial court separated the workers' compensation claim from the tort claims but let the tort claims continue. Lincare and Stewart appealed this decision. The appellate court determined that the exclusivity provisions of the Workers' Compensation Act barred Martin's tort claims against Lincare, as her injuries were deemed workplace-related. Stewart's challenge to Martin's tort-of-outrage claim was rejected, with the court finding that the specifics of the claim weren't reviewable through a mandamus petition. Stewart also claimed Martin shouldn't be entitled to a jury trial since Martin waived this right during her Lincare employment. The court, emphasizing the importance of jury trials, disagreed, noting the waiver was only relevant to Martin's employment with Lincare, not any claims against Stewart.
"Special Employee" Status Shields Midsouth from Negligence Claims: Court Validates Exclusive-Remedy Provisions
Court Sides with Defendant in Workplace Injury Case, Granting Immunity Under Workers' Compensation Act
Court Upholds Dismissal of Plaintiff's Claims against Employer on Grounds of Expiry and Lack of Evidence
Defendant's Petition for Dismissal of Plaintiff's Claims Denied by Court
Court Reverses Ruling on Defendant's Status as Employer's Agent in Plaintiff's Accident Case
Interpretation of "Employer" under the Workers' Compensation Act Challenges Defendant's Claim to Immunity
Defendant's Mandamus Petition Denied: Alleged Post-Accident Negligence Not Covered by Workers' Compensation Exclusivity Provisions
Court Upholds City of Muscle Shoals' Claim to Immunity Over Gattman Park Injury
Tenax Granted Immunity in Worker's Injury Lawsuit due to Alabama Workers' Compensation Act
Court Reverses Denial of Summary Judgment, Finds Uninstalled Safety Saw Does Not Equate to Removal of a Safety Guard
Rock Wool Asserts Worker's Injury Claims Barred by Workers' Compensation Act, Countering Casons' Suit under Employer's Liability Ac
TDY Employee's Injury Lawsuit Faces Jurisdiction Challenge on Appeal After Key Counts Dismissed by Trial Court.
Court Debates Enforceability of Unapproved Workers' Compensation Settlement After Employee's Death
Exposure to Hazardous Chemicals Limited to Workers' Compensation Remedies
Plaintiff Appealed a Summary Judgment in Favor of APCo on Claims of Negligence and Wantonness
Tort Claims Against Special Employer are Barred by Exclusive-Remedy Provision of the Act
No Evidence of Toxicity Exposure or Work-Related Disease
Procedural Dispute of Proper Court to review Exclusivity Provisions
Administrative Rule deemed Willful Conduct: Claim Allowed under Exclusive Remedy Provisions
Release of Claims Under Workers' Compensation Act does not include Claims Based on Willful Removal of Safety Devicee
"Special Employee" Status Shields Midsouth from Negligence Claims: Court Validates Exclusive-Remedy Provisions
Court Reverses Dismissal of Injured Worker's Tort Claims Related to Post-Accident Care
Tenax Granted Immunity in Worker's Injury Lawsuit due to Alabama Workers' Compensation Act
Court Reverses Denial of Summary Judgment, Finds Uninstalled Safety Saw Does Not Equate to Removal of a Safety Guard
Rock Wool Asserts Worker's Injury Claims Barred by Workers' Compensation Act, Countering Casons' Suit under Employer's Liability Ac
TDY Employee's Injury Lawsuit Faces Jurisdiction Challenge on Appeal After Key Counts Dismissed by Trial Court.
A Prolonged Battle Over Workers' Compensation and Negligence Claims
Plaintiff Appealed a Summary Judgment in Favor of APCo on Claims of Negligence and Wantonness
Tort Claims Against Special Employer are Barred by Exclusive-Remedy Provision of the Act
Procedural Dispute of Proper Court to review Exclusivity Provisions
Release of Claims Under Workers' Compensation Act does not include Claims Based on Willful Removal of Safety Devicee