Franklyn Jenkins contested the Houston Circuit Court's ruling that favored American Transport, Inc. (ATI) by denying Jenkins benefits under the Alabama Workers' Compensation Act for injuries he incurred during work in Minnesota. ATI countered, claiming that Jenkins wasn't eligible since the mishap occurred outside Alabama and he wasn't strictly an ATI employee, but rather an independent contractor.
Jenkins's primary contention was his misclassification as an independent contractor by ATI and the court's denial of his request for extra discovery time. Notably, a written service agreement between Jenkins and ATI labeled Jenkins as the "Lessor" and ATI as the "Lessee". This contract, coupled with ATI's evident control over Jenkins's work, challenges the assertion that Jenkins was an independent contractor. Although Jenkins owned his tractor, ATI assisted him with the license plate and provided him with a trailer.
David Hartman, representing ATI, shed light on this dynamic, explaining ATI's involvement in acquiring the trailer and license plate for Jenkins. The accident in question, involving Jenkins transporting steel carts, resulted from a shifting load. A pivotal point revolves around determining Jenkins's employment status. The court concluded that sufficient evidence exists contesting Jenkins's classification as an independent contractor. Consequently, the court overturned the initial decision and remanded the case for more in-depth proceedings.
Alabama Court of Civil Appeals Overturns Dismissal of Workers' Compensation Claim Due to Out-of-State Agreement
Dispute Over Jurisdiction and Applicability of Alabama Workers' Compensation Act to Out-of-State Injury
Court Reverses Ruling on Defendant's Status as Employer's Agent in Plaintiff's Accident Case
Alabama Court Reviews Employer-Employee vs Independent Contractor Determination in Workers’ Compensation Claim Case
The Alabama Court of Civil Appeals determined the status of a newspaper delivery person as an independent contractor.
Court Decides Plaintiff was an Independent Contractor and Not and Employee